Friday, August 29, 2008

Response to ‘Problem Solving, Creativity, Brains, & Co-coaching’

This blog is a response to Mr. Graham’s blog on ‘Problem Solving, Creativity, Brains, & Co-coaching’:

http://catchthevision.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/problem-solvingcreativity-brains-and-co-coaching/

The four stages mentioned in the blog is a systematic approach converting intuition into a rational thought and it is true in all the cases. But people will not realise this as they are overwhelmed with the solution.

The incubation stage is very important in those areas where the usage of creativity is essential, like ad agencies. The work culture in some MNCs underlines this fact, where creative flow happens only when the work environment supports the incubation stage.

What I felt about co-coaching is nothing but ‘Synergy’. But it will be utilized to the maximum only when the persons coming together for co-coaching are complementory in nature. There should be some understanding between the co-coaching people. That does not mean they should be like-minded personalities. Like-minded persons will give a small portion of the overall result. But persons who are complementory in nature helps in team winning- where one person lacks, the other one strengthens and vice versa.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Individual Quality leads to Organisational Quality

Quality in subsystems leads to organisational quality. This is how Total Quality Management works. But how quality is maintained in subsytems? If we divide the whole organisation in a structured and systematic form, we get a number of subsystems. While dividing those subsystems further, we will end up in a single person- the head who is responsible for all the activities in that subsystem.

Quality in a subsystem is the collective effort of adopting or creating and maintaining quality in all the resources involved in the subsystem. But non-living resources like machines, materials, environment etc. cannot create quality by its own. So the only resource that can adopt or create and maintain quality is the Human Resources.

The human resources(HRs) in a subsystem can be classified into three -

1. The head of the subsystem(Head of Department)

2. The direct HRs who are the employees and are responsible for the work in that subsystem(eg. the workers in a production department who operate the machines)

3. The indirect HRs who are employees of other subsystems in the organisation; but who supports the functions of another subsystem in the same organisation. (eg. an employee in purchasing department of an organisation contacts the production department. Here the employee of purchasing department is an indirect HR in a production department).

It is the quality of the above three HR catagories leads to the quality in the subsystem. But we cannot expect quality from everyone- Either the employees are unaware of the importance of quality or they are too lazy to adopt quality. This scenario can again be divided into two.

1. Head of the department is not adopting quality: Here it is very difficult to implement quality in that department or subsystem (chances of implementing quality is less than 1%).

2. The direct HRs or indirect HRs are not adopting quality: Here implementing quality in the subsystem is not so difficult, eventhough there are some resistances.

Now take the second case where there is more than 99% to implement quality. Here the head of the department needs to give proper awareness about quality, its importance in an organisation and how it makes one’s life(both personal and work) easy. This has to be done through proper and on going trainings. The next step is how to implement quality if the employees are not willing or are too lazy to adopt it. Here comes the standardisation of work for our rescue. Make the daily work, especially the routine ones, into a standardised form by dividing the job into simpler and structured parts which includes quality too. Make a job flow which contains the quality works. By implementing this structures format, the workers may not realise that they are following quality practices.

Allow the workers to make mistakes and learn from those mistakes. But do not make the same mistake twice. It is good to record the mistakes and the actions taken and should be circulated to all in that subsystem to aviod them in future.

The second case described above is possible only when the head of the department is willing to create or adopt and maintain quality. A person cannot adopt quality into the work without adopting quality into his/ her mind first.

The importance of quality should be realised and must be adopted into a person’s day-to-day personal life. Only when that person do so, he/she is able to replicate or adopt the same into work life also.

Therefore quality of a subsystem starts from the quality of life the head of the department is observing. Without quality in personal life, a person cannot implement or maintain quality in an organisation. Thus quality in individual life leads to quality in subsystems and hence leads to organisational quality.

Total Quality Management (TQM) starts from quality in individual life.